[SUCULTURE]

“Being Poor Is

Expensive”:

Structural

Inequality, Social

Exclusion, and the

Hidden Costs of

Poverty in the

Context of Youth

Violence.

 

 

 

 

 

Abstract:

 

This publication critically explores the title in British rapper Bashy’s latest album — “Being poor is expensive” — as a socio-economic lens through which to understand the systemic factors contributing to youth violence, particularly knife crime.

 

Poverty, as argued here, functions not only as material deprivation but also as a costly, self-reinforcing cycle of social exclusion, emotional strain, and institutional neglect. By synthesizing insights from sociological, criminological, and economic literature, this paper examines how the ‘costs’ of poverty manifest economically, psychologically, and spatially — especially in marginalized urban communities. Knife crime is framed not as a failure of individual morality but as a symptom of entrenched structural violence. The article concludes with a call for systemic reform grounded in economic justice, equitable public investment, community empowerment, and the transformative power of community-led economic ecosystems.

 

1. Introduction.

 

British artist Bashy’s evocative anthem “being poor is expensive” highlights a fundamental paradox of modern society: that those with the least resources often pay the highest prices — not only financially, but also socially, psychologically, and physically. 

 

For many in deprived urban environments, poverty entails not only hardship but cumulative disadvantage. This burden is especially evident in youth experiences of crime, violence, and systemic marginalisation. Knife crime, in particular, emerges not as a spontaneous act of deviance, but as a rationalized response to conditions of structural neglect.

 

This article investigates the economic, social, and institutional “expenses” of being poor and how these contribute to youth involvement in knife crime. It argues that effective solutions must move beyond punitive approaches and instead address the deep-rooted inequalities that shape opportunity, safety, and well-being.

 

2. The Economic Costs of Poverty: Understanding the Poverty Premium.

 

The phrase “poverty premium” refers to the paradox in which low-income individuals and families often pay more — not less — for basic goods and services. Far from being solely a matter of limited income, poverty involves a pattern of structural economic disadvantage that increases everyday costs, reduces life chances, and entrenches marginalisation.

 

This reality plays out in multiple, interlocking ways:

 

2.1. Higher Prices for Essentials.

 

Low-income households often pay more for food, fuel, transport, and other necessities:

 

Food deserts: Many poor urban and rural communities are often constrained to rely on food deserts — areas with limited or no access to affordable, options — leaving residents dependent on overpriced or a narrow range of products, thereby inflating everyday food costs. 

 

Energy costs: Prepayment meters — commonly used in low-income households — often come with higher tariffs, locking users into more expensive fuel arrangements.

 

Transport inequality: Those without cars may face long, costly commutes due to delays, infrequent or unreliable public transport, especially in underdeveloped areas. This not only limits mobility and access, but increases overall long-term costs for children, and families with children.

 

2.2. Exploitative Financial Products.

 

Without access to fair financial services, many low-income individuals are pushed into high-cost credit and exploitative financial arrangements:

 

Payday loans and rent-to-own schemes: These products often carry triple-digit annual percentage rates (APRs), creating debt traps that are difficult to escape.

 

Banking exclusion: Those with poor credit or no fixed address may be unable to open accounts or secure overdraft protection, leading to reliance on cash and vulnerability to theft or fraud.

 

Digital exclusion: Inability to access competitive online rates for goods, or services, further increases costs, resulting in households missing out on opportunities.

 

2.3. Substandard, Overpriced Housing.

 

Housing represents one of the most acute manifestations of the poverty premium:

 

Low-quality private rentals: In deprived areas, landlords often charge disproportionately high rents for properties that are poorly maintained or unsafe.

 

Fuel poverty: Poor insulation, outdated heating systems, or single-glazed windows lead to higher energy bills in winter.

 

Overcrowding and instability: Temporary housing or short-term lets increase stress, reduce educational stability for children, and may trigger health issues — leading to further financial and social costs.

 

2.4. Limited Access to Services.

 

Access to key public services is not only harder in low-income areas — it is also more expensive in terms of time and indirect costs:

 

Healthcare: Long waiting times, underfunded clinics, or distant hospitals mean that families often incur travel costs or lose income taking time off work to access treatment.

 

Childcare: Affordable, quality childcare is often unavailable in poorer areas, preventing parents — especially mothers — from entering or remaining in the workforce.

 

Education: Children in low-income families may attend underperforming schools, lack educational materials at home, or require expensive travel to better institutions.

 

2.5. Compounded Financial Insecurity.

 

Poverty also generates long-term economic insecurity through:

 

Lack of savings buffers: Without savings, even small unexpected expenses (e.g., a broken appliance, school trip, or medical bill) can trigger cycles of debt.

 

Cost of emergencies: Low-income individuals may pay a premium in times of crisis due to a lack of options, such as high-interest loans, costly last-minute travel, or emergency childcare.

 

Insurance gap: Many poor households are underinsured or uninsured, increasing financial vulnerability in the face of theft, fire, or job loss.

 

These costs compound over time, reducing the ability of families to invest in stability — such as savings, education, or mobility — and locking generations into cycles of deprivation.

 

3. Social and Psychological Costs of Poverty.

 

In addition to economic disadvantages, poverty extracts heavy social and psychological tolls:

 

Mental health burden: Chronic stress, trauma from exposure to community violence, and limited access to mental health support are prevalent in marginalized communities (Fowler et al., 2009).

 

Stigma and institutional neglect: Poor youth are often criminalized early, misdiagnosed in schools, or denied support due to systemic biases and underfunded services (Wilkinson & Pickett, 2009).

 

Educational exclusion: Under-resourced schools often lack the capacity to support at-risk students, resulting in disciplinary measures like suspensions or expulsions rather than inclusion. These “push-out” effects feed into the school-to-prison pipeline (Thornberry et al., 2003).

 

Loss of trust in public systems: Repeated experiences of state neglect — from housing to policing — erode community trust in institutions meant to protect and uplift them.

 

For Black youths, these compounded disadvantages foster alienation, low self-worth, and increased vulnerability to peer influence and gang affiliation.

 

4. Knife Crime as a Consequence of Structural Disadvantage.

 

Knife crime should not be interpreted in isolation from the broader structural conditions that give rise to it. In communities marked by poverty, many young people view carrying a knife not as a deviant act but a necessity for self-protection. This rationalized behavior is shaped by:

 

• • • Perceived lack of safety in the community, and ineffective policing.
    • Peer influence, particularly in areas where gang affiliation is normalized or even incentivized.
    • Scarcity of alternatives, such as access to safe recreational spaces, mentorship, or employment.

 

Knife crime, therefore, is less a cultural pathology than a survival strategy emerging from systemic marginalization. These young individuals are not inherently violent — they are responding to an environment in which structural violence has eroded both opportunity and safety (Galtung, 1969).

 

5. The Cost to Society: Beyond the Individual.

 

The consequences of youth knife crime are not limited to victims and perpetrators. They reverberate across families, communities, and the state:

 

• • • Families lose children to violence or incarceration.
    • Communities suffer from fear, instability, and reputational damage.
    • Public institutions bear long-term financial burdens, such as the cost of incarceration, policing, and emergency services.
    • Lost economic potential of a generation cut off from education and employment.

 

Thus, the “expense” of poverty becomes a societal liability, one that cannot be solved through criminal justice responses alone.

 

6. Toward Solutions: Structural and Community-Based Approaches.

 

To address the root causes of youth knife crime, interventions must move from symptom management to structural transformation. Effective strategies include:

 

6.1 Economic and Urban Reform.
Reducing the poverty premium through financial inclusion, fair rent regulation, and local economic development.

Improving access to affordable, quality housing, transport, and public services in marginalized neighborhoods.

 

6.2 Education and Youth Investment.
Funding schools in deprived areas to reduce teacher burnout and improve student support systems.

Offering extracurricular programs, digital access, and mentorship to divert youths from harmful environments.

 

6.3 Community-Based Initiatives.
Establishing youth centers, mental health hubs, and restorative justice programs tailored to local needs.

Supporting grassroots leadership to co-design safety and inclusion strategies.

 

6.4 Policing and Justice Reform.
Shifting from punitive models to trauma-informed, community-policing frameworks that rebuild trust.

Expanding diversion and rehabilitation options for first-time offenders, especially youths.

 

6.5 Family and Mental Health Support.
Providing accessible therapy, parenting workshops, and social support for families under stress.

Addressing generational trauma and its interlinkages with violence and antisocial behavior.

 

By prioritizing community voice and agency, these solutions reframe violence prevention as a matter of social justice, not just law enforcement.

 

7. Beyond Government Policy: Community-led Ecosystems.

 

Community-led economic ecosystems can be a powerful counterforce to structural poverty and youth violence.

 

To mitigate the recurring cycle of deprivation and knife crime, communities must move beyond reliance on top-down policy and actively organize to build resilience, autonomy, and economic sustainability from the ground up.

 

Below is a framework for how communities can mobilize:

 

1. Community Wealth Building (CWB).

 

Definition: A strategic approach that redirects wealth back into local communities through inclusive ownership and democratic control of assets.

 

Actions:

 

Develop cooperatives: Worker-owned businesses (e.g., food co-ops, repair shops, childcare centers) empower residents and keep profits circulating locally.

Anchor institutions: Collaborate with local hospitals, universities, and councils to procure services locally, hire local people, and use community suppliers.

Land trusts and housing co-ops: These ensure long-term affordability and prevent displacement through community ownership of housing, and land.

 

2. Local Investment Networks and Credit Unions.

 

Issue: As the article notes, predatory lending and lack of access to mainstream finance disproportionately harm low-income households.

 

Actions:

 

Credit unions: Community-run, non-profit financial institutions that offer fair loans, savings, and financial education.

Community investment funds: Pooled capital from residents, businesses, and ethical investors used to fund local projects (e.g., youth training centers, green businesses, pop-up markets).

Social enterprises: Encourage the formation of mission-driven businesses reinvesting profits into community development or services for marginalized youth.

 

3. Skills Exchange and Youth Apprenticeships.

Issue: Young people often face limited access to job markets due to poor schooling, stigma, or criminal records.

 

Actions:

 

Local skills mapping: Identify skills already present within the community and create a local directory for mutual exchange or mentorship (e.g., carpentry, digital design, catering).

Apprenticeship schemes: Partner with small businesses and tradespeople to offer structured training, especially for youths at risk of exclusion.

Community hubs: Develop multi-use spaces that double as co-working sites, creative studios, and learning centers.

 

4. Participatory Budgeting and Civic Power.

Issue: Decisions affecting the community are often made without input from those most affected.

 

Actions:

 

Participatory budgeting: Advocate for local councils to allocate a portion of their budgets for residents to decide how to spend — prioritizing youth services, safety initiatives, or start-up grants.

Community assemblies: Regular forums where residents co-design economic priorities and hold service providers accountable.

Youth leadership councils: Give young people real decision-making power over programs and spending that affect their lives.

 

5. Cultural Capital and Economic Identity.

Issue: Communities are often portrayed as ‘zones of deficit’ rather than ‘sites of innovation and creativity’.

 

Actions:

 

Support cultural entrepreneurship: Invest in music, fashion, design, and food ventures led by local talent, especially youth.

Festivals and marketplaces: Create regular opportunities to showcase local products, music, and businesses—reviving pride and economic activity.

Reframe narratives: Use media, art, and storytelling to change perceptions of “disadvantaged” areas and highlight community resilience and talent.

 

A targeted equity lens is necessary to ensure that community-led initiatives in the most deprived areas receive additional scaffolding and resources.

 

For such community-driven ecosystems to thrive, they must be complemented by systemic support — including sustained public/private investment, capacity-building programs, and legal frameworks that facilitate asset transfers (e.g., community land ownership).

 

8. Conclusion.

 

The poverty premium reveals that poverty is not merely a condition of having less, but of paying more for essential aspects of daily life. This economic burden is not accidental—it reflects deep structural inequities in how markets, services, and institutions are designed. As such, the poverty premium contributes directly to the reproduction of poverty across generations, reduces opportunities for social mobility, and, as discussed elsewhere in the article, contributes to the conditions under which youth violence and knife crime take root.

 

For communities to break the cycle of poverty and violence they must move toward self-determined economic ecosystems. This involves democratizing ownership, fostering interdependence, and building pathways for youth to thrive economically and socially.

 

Bashy’s streetwise lyrical piece “Being poor is expensive,” blends realism and rhythm to deliver hard truths. Bashy’s album  is a critique of systemic inequality — an indictment of the way poverty not only deprives but punishes. 

 

For youths in deprived communities, this cost is paid in fear, missed opportunity, lost lives, and community disempowerment.

 

While structural policy change remains essential, locally organized economic agency is a powerful and immediate tool to mitigate the long-term effects of exclusion.

 

Knife crime cannot be tackled in isolation from the structural conditions that breed it. Real change requires structural investment, intersectional policies, and a societal commitment to equity and inclusion.

 

In acknowledging the true cost of poverty, we move closer to meaningful, long-term solutions — ones that prioritize dignity, prevention, inclusion and justice over punishment.

 

References:

• Fowler, P. J., Tompsett, C. J., Braciszewski, J. M., Jacques-Tiura, A. J., & Baltes, B. B. (2009). Community violence: A meta-analysis on the effect of exposure and mental health outcomes of children and adolescents. Development and Psychopathology, 21(1), 227–259.
• Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191.
• Glennerster, H., Hills, J., Piachaud, D., & Webb, J. (2004). One hundred years of poverty and policy. Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
• Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Harvard University Press.
• Thornberry, T. P., Lizotte, A. J., Krohn, M. D., Farnworth, M., & Jang, S. J. (2003). Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory. Criminology, 32(1), 47–83.
• Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. (2009). The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better. Allen Lane.

[Gen-Z Talks]

 

@SUCULTURE.

 

A core insight is that systemic underinvestment in schools, mental health, and social services contributes directly to youth disenfranchisement. Young people in neglected communities are often disengaged not because they lack potential, but because institutions have failed to meet their needs or treat them with dignity.

[The African Monetarist]

 

@SUCULTURE.

 

Absolutely! Communities that have strong organizing traditions, benefit from focused economic development that become tool for trust-building, capacity development and bridging inequality gap.

 

With intentional equity planning, tailored investment, and peer-to-peer learning between communities, community wealth-building can be a scalable and inclusive model for sustainable change—even in areas facing complex social challenges.

 

[Charlotte]

A persistent myth in public discourse is that poverty and crime stem from individual failings — laziness, irresponsibility, or lack of ambition.

 

However, “being poor is expensive” underscores that such narratives ignore the systemic conditions in which individuals operate.

 

Youth choices — whether to carry a knife, join a gang, or drop out of school — are often made under constraints shaped by poverty, fear, and social exclusion.

 

Implications: Policy responses must shift focus from punishing individuals to transforming the conditions that produce harmful behaviors.

 

C.

 

[Author]

Posts